/* nursingwritersbureau.com theme functions */ /* nursingwritersbureau.com theme functions */ {"id":82710,"date":"2023-05-14T19:32:03","date_gmt":"2023-05-14T19:32:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingwritersbureau.com\/?p=82710"},"modified":"2023-05-14T19:32:03","modified_gmt":"2023-05-14T19:32:03","slug":"psychology-quiz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nursingwritersbureau.com\/psychology-quiz\/","title":{"rendered":"Psychology quiz"},"content":{"rendered":"
Question 1 (2 points)In Minnesota vs Dickerson, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted the plain touch doctrine, allowing officers to seize what, using the sense of touch during a lawful patdown without a warrant?Question 1 options:Probable causeEvidenceFruit of the poisonous treeWritSaveQuestion 2 (2 points)Many Supreme Court cases recognize that the basic purpose of the Fourth Amendment is to safeguard the privacy and what of United States citizens?Question 2 options:MoneySecurityEvidenceWitnessSaveQuestion 3 (2 points)The Fourth Amendment measures what as the ultimate measure of the constitutionality of a government search?Question 3 options:ReasonablenessEvidenceUnreasonablenessObjectiveSaveQuestion 4 (2 points)The Fourth Amendments states that “the right of the people to be secure” in their what?Question 4 options:CarGarageWorkplacePersons, houses, papers, and effectsSaveQuestion 5 (2 points)The plain view doctrine applies only to sightings by the police based on what type of circumstances?Question 5 options:IllegalLegalSearch and seizureWarrantless searchSaveQuestion 6 (2 points)Authority to enter and\/or search an open field with a warrant is supported by what case?Question 6 options:Hester v. USIllinois v. KrullTerry v. OhioThornon v. U.S.SaveQuestion 7 (2 points)In Chimel v. California, a search incident to lawful arrest does not require issuance of a warrant based on what measure?Question 7 options:ProtectiveReasonableWarrantPoisonous treeSaveQuestion 8 (2 points)No warrant is required to seize what in plain view?Question 8 options:Poisonous treeEvidenceWritProbable causeSaveQuestion 9 (2 points)In Illinois v. Rodriguez, if a person gives what, no warrant is required for a search or seizure.Question 9 options:Poisonous treePermissionWritProbable causeSaveQuestion 10 (2 points)In what case, can police stop a suspect as long as there is a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act?Question 10 options:Terry v. OhioMiranda v. ArizonaGideon v. WainwrightIllinois v. Rodriguez<\/p>\n \n
Question 1 (2 points)In Minnesota vs Dickerson, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted the plain touch doctrine, allowing officers to seize what, using the sense of touch during a lawful patdown without a warrant?Question 1 options:Probable causeEvidenceFruit of the poisonous treeWritSaveQuestion 2 (2 points)Many Supreme Court cases recognize that the basic purpose of the Fourth Amendment […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[]},"categories":[31],"tags":[32],"yoast_head":"\n