/* nursingwritersbureau.com theme functions */ /* nursingwritersbureau.com theme functions */ {"id":5765,"date":"2020-08-19T19:06:02","date_gmt":"2020-08-19T19:06:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingwritersbureau.com\/?p=5765"},"modified":"2020-08-19T19:06:02","modified_gmt":"2020-08-19T19:06:02","slug":"unit-5this-assignment-is-also-in-2-parts-a-discussion-a-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nursingwritersbureau.com\/unit-5this-assignment-is-also-in-2-parts-a-discussion-a-project\/","title":{"rendered":"Unit 5:This assignment is also in 2 Parts- A discussion & a Project"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Unit 5:<\/strong>This assignment is also in 2 Parts- A discussion & a Project<\/strong><\/p>\n

Due 08\/28\/17<\/strong><\/p>\n

Although theoretically a researcher conducting a phenomenological inquiry could establish hypotheses to predict the structure and features of phenomena being explored, this approach would not follow the “bracketing” method suggested by Husserl. What are the advantages of either using hypotheses to predict phenomena or bracketing to explore such phenomena? Are these two approaches mutually exclusive? If so, why?<\/p>\n

Due 08\/28\/17<\/strong><\/p>\n

Heidegger’s concept of fallenness was appropriated by philosophical Christian theologians such as Karl Jaspers as a way of explaining the relationship between reality and our fallen condition as humans. Jaspers, in particular, implied that objectivity resulting from the scientific method could not explain all human knowing. Indeed, modern psychological inquiry into religious experience has shown that such experience may be personal by nature, not easily reduced to delineated objects of science. Does this perspective, namely, the subjective nature of personal religious experience, align well with both descriptive and interpretative approaches to phenomenology? Why or why not?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Individual Project<\/strong><\/p>\n

Topic: Phenomenology<\/strong><\/p>\n

10 Strategic Points Qualitative Study Extraction<\/p>\n

Due Date:<\/strong>\u00a0Sep 04, 2017 <\/strong><\/p>\n

Details:<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the prospectus, proposal, and dissertation there are 10 strategic points that need to be clear, simple, correct, and aligned to ensure the research is doable, valuable, and credible. These points, which provide a guide or vision for the research, are present in almost any research study. The ability to identify these points is one of the first skills required in the creation of a viable doctoral dissertation. In this assignment, you will identify and evaluate 10 strategic points in a published qualitative research study.<\/p>\n

General Requirements:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:<\/p>\n