/* nursingwritersbureau.com theme functions */
/* nursingwritersbureau.com theme functions */
{"id":2359,"date":"2020-08-07T19:04:04","date_gmt":"2020-08-07T19:04:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingwritersbureau.com\/?p=2359"},"modified":"2020-08-07T19:04:04","modified_gmt":"2020-08-07T19:04:04","slug":"nurs-81-wk-6-7-assign","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nursingwritersbureau.com\/nurs-81-wk-6-7-assign\/","title":{"rendered":"NURS 81 WK 6 &7 ASSIGN"},"content":{"rendered":" <\/p>\n
Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature<\/p>\n
This Assignment expands upon the work you have been conducting for this week\u2019s Discussion.) you will conduct a search for literature on your selected practice problem. A Literature Review Matrix template will be used to identify gaps in the literature.<\/p>\n
To prepare:<\/p>\n
Consider the practice problem you addressed in this week\u2019s Discussion. (You may select a new issue if necessary, but it is not recommended): Practice problem chosen: Health literacy and self-care activities, self-efficacy, and health related outcome of patients with type 2 Diabetes.<\/p>\n
Review the guidelines in the Literature Review Matrix, included in the Learning Resources.<\/p>\n
Formulate a research question around your issue as indicated in Part I. Then <\/p>\n
complete Part II of the Matrix, identifying the resources you will use, search terms and criteria, and Boolean search strings.<\/p>\n
Using the Walden Library, locate 10 articles related to your research question. At least one article must be a systematic review.<\/p>\n
All of the articles should be primary sources. NOTE: If appropriate, you may use the four articles you reviewed for this week\u2019s Discussion.<\/p>\n
Actual Assignment:<\/p>\n
Complete Part I and Part II of the Literature Review Matrix template.<\/p>\n
Begin working on Part III.<\/p>\n
Review Part III of the Literature Review Matrix and notice which middle range theories were used most frequently in the articles you reviewed.<\/p>\n
Consider the appropriate use of the theoretical frameworks in each article.<\/p>\n
Review the information on empiricism presented in Chapter 1 of Theoretical Basis for Nursing and Chapter 6 in The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence as you consider your response to Part IV.<\/p>\n
Complete Part III of the Literature Review Matrix.<\/p>\n
In your analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature, note the appropriate use of the theoretical frameworks.<\/p>\n
Complete Part IV addressing the influence of empiricism on quantitative methodology.<\/p>\n
REFERENCES<\/p>\n
McEwin, M., & Wills, E.M. (2014). Theoretical basis for nursing. (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.<\/p>\n
Chapter 10, “Introduction to Middle Range Nursing Theories”<\/p>\n
Chapter 11, “Overview of Selected Middle Range Nursing Theories”<\/p>\n
Gray, J.R., Grove, S.K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burns and Grove\u2019s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.<\/p>\n
Chapter 3, “Introduction to Quantitative Research”<\/p>\n
Chapter 4, “Introduction to Qualitative Research”<\/p>\n
Chapter 6 guides nurses through the process of identifying research objectives, developing research questions, and creating research hypotheses.<\/p>\n
Chapter 7 examines the process of preparing for a literature review to support research efforts.<\/p>\n
Chapter 13, “Outcomes Research”<\/p>\n
Moran, K., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2017). The doctor of nursing practice scholarly project: A framework for success (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/p>\n
Review Chapter 6, “Developing the Scholarly Project”<\/p>\n
Armola, R., Bourgault, A., Halm, M., Board, R., Bucher, L., Harrington, L., & … Medina, J. (2009). AACN levels of evidence: What’s new? Critical Care Nurse, 29(4), 70\u201373. doi: 10.4037\/ccn2009969<\/p>\n
Elkins, M. Y. (2010). Using PICO and the brief report to answer clinical questions. Nursing, 40(4), 59\u201360. doi: 10.1097\/01.NURSE.0000369871.07714.39<\/p>\n
Fawcett, J., & Garity, J. (2009). Chapter 6: Evaluation of middle-range theories. Evaluating Research for Evidence-Based Nursing. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: F. A. Davis.<\/p>\n
DeSanto-Madeya, S., & Fawcett, J. (2009). Toward Understanding and Measuring Adaptation Level in the Context of the Roy Adaptation Model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 22(4), 355\u2013359.<\/p>\n
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I an introduction to gathering, evaluating, and recording the evidence… fifth in a series. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47\u201352. doi: 10.1097\/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c<\/p>\n
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III the process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43\u201351. doi: 10.1097\/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5 Edit question’s body _NURS_8110PICOLITERATUREREVIEWPLAIN.doc NURS8110WK67ASSIGNSAMPLEPAPER.doc<\/p>\n
Edit question’s attachments <\/p>\n \n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/nursingwritersbureau.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/order_now.png\")
<\/a>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"